|
Post by IGNIGNOC on Dec 29, 2007 7:24:29 GMT -5
#105
On a bet with a mysterious tall, handsome, rifle-bearing man with devilishly piercing eyes, DRZ will endeavor to outrun a speeding bullet in his almighty PWNING OH SEVEN SIVICK ESS EYE TYPE ARR SEDAN. Unfortunately for him, and fortunately for the rest of the known universe, he will attempt to pass when V-Tec kicks in, yo! and will swerve radically from his lane into that of the bullet, which will impact his grape at a velocity near 2,500 feet per second (roughly 1,705 mph) dispatching him quickly. Then I, I mean, that wickedly handsome, suave, powerfully-built man will then stroll down to the wreckage with my, er, his K31 slung over his shoulder, pilfer his body to retrieve my "bet money," and mutter to the broken, dainty corpse, "I told you you couldn't, diptard...."
|
|
|
Post by nightmare75 on Dec 29, 2007 21:16:45 GMT -5
Seriously? All that stuff about manliness and all you can call him is diptard!?! Come on! Be a more badass with your insults.
It seems like you're not even trying.
|
|
|
Post by DeltaMustang65 on Dec 30, 2007 16:55:50 GMT -5
LOL I was about to congradulate Mike. I was fully expecting him to advertise hi...I mean, the mysterious stranger's manhood somehow.
|
|
|
Post by IGNIGNOC on Dec 30, 2007 18:13:36 GMT -5
Did I forget to mention the sheer overwhelming size of my...erm that incredibly awesome dude's hugely powerful p3n0rz?!?! zomg!!1
Actually, I'm trying to keep my language in check lately. Unfortunately, when you type F-bombs like it was the spirit of Christmas on the intarwebz, it becomes fairly easy to start dropping them in conversation IRL. That's something I'm trying to avoid. I for one think that rampant profanity makes you sound like a fool in spoken language, so I'm avoiding that contingency.
But, if it satisfies you, I could call him a "shithawk."
|
|
|
Post by nightmare75 on Dec 30, 2007 22:06:36 GMT -5
That's an improvement.
But I agree, when you use rampant profanity, it makes it sound like you have a very limited vocabulary. There are cases where nothing describes your feelings better, though.
|
|
|
Post by DeltaMustang65 on Jan 8, 2008 16:22:38 GMT -5
I really try to give Tupac the benefit of the doubt whenever I can, but he's really annoying me lately. Especially his useless contributions to the GaymeF@gs Q&A topic I have going. Therefore...
I'd like to see Tupac have to print out all the B.S. he's ever typed, and have it force fed to him until he dies of suffocation/ink poisoning/rectal blockage/etc.
I'd have simply asked him to stop "post-whoring", but I'd get modded at GF@gs, so I had to be nice. Blah...
|
|
|
Post by nightmare75 on Jan 8, 2008 19:51:25 GMT -5
He annoys me with 9 out of 10 posts. His sticky topic is probably worth it, but other than that, he just needs to stop talking.
|
|
|
Post by Rotary on Jan 9, 2008 3:56:28 GMT -5
Delta, may I say something?
Your entire QA thread is pretty damn pointless anywhere other than an off-topic discussion.
So why are pointless posts in it such a big deal?
|
|
|
Post by DeltaMustang65 on Jan 9, 2008 15:54:12 GMT -5
Of course it's pointless, it's a joke topic and it's just for fun. My problem is that Tupac is post-whoring mostly nonsense, thus ruining anyone else's chance to answer (hopefully in a JOKING manner). Also, wth was with his post where both his question and answer where "what?"?
|
|
|
Post by Rotary on Jan 9, 2008 16:14:03 GMT -5
See, that's where it goes wonky.
It's a JOKE topic... Must rules be followed to a T?
It's not hard to mess with him a bit... If he posts nonsense, then answer his question, and ask something about WHY he posted x answer, etc.
|
|
|
Post by nightmare75 on Jan 9, 2008 16:27:35 GMT -5
The thing is, if you ask a question that you think is moderately clever or may illicit an amusing response, you don't want it answered with "WTF?" or something equally unfunny.
Also, there's not really much of an opening to answer the question "What?" in an interesting manner.
|
|
|
Post by DeltaMustang65 on Jan 9, 2008 22:28:58 GMT -5
Exactly.
It's not unheard of to have rules in a joke topic, either. Or at the very least, some type of structure.
As Nightmare said, setting up someone for a joke can get old real fast if you've got some ass post-whoring every insignificant brain fart he has.
|
|
|
Post by IGNIGNOC on Jan 10, 2008 3:01:21 GMT -5
I particularly like the "word problem" type questions in those Q/A topics, because they start out sounding so proper, then totally skew themselves to all logical thought. It is also very disappointing when you see one ridiculously funny question answered with "erm... I dunno..." instead of an equally ridiculously funny answer.
|
|
|
Post by ciscokid on Mar 7, 2008 12:56:09 GMT -5
You guys ever notice DRZ_PERSON's initials are DP? Considering that...
#106 How bout an endless stream of monster cock gay porn actors tear him apart from the inside out? I don't wanna watch it, just see the aftermath.
|
|